However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 22, 2016, at around 21:30, the Defendant: (a) moved on the street in front of Da, vehicle parking issues, etc. in Sungwon-si B; and (b) around that time, “I am going to the police officers assigned to the PO station of Changwon-gu Police Station to the site after receiving a 112 order of 112 order,” and “I am to the police officers assigned to the site; (b) I am out of the patrol vehicle; (c) I am to the direction of the patrol vehicle; and (d) I am to the police officers, as I am to the direction of the patrol vehicle; and (d) I am to the police officers, “I am to the direction of the patrol vehicle”; and (e) am to the police officers.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties on handling reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentence], taking into account the following circumstances, such as the age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., as indicated in the records of this case, the sentence is determined as per the disposition.

An unfavorable circumstance: A normal situation that is advantageous to the fact that no agreement has been made with the victim: The fact that there is no other criminal records except one fine.