If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 04:30 on January 10, 2017, the Defendant received 112 reports to the effect that the Defendant appears to drive a CKan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn

Although there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, although the police officer E, who was called up after receiving the above 112 report, demanded the defendant to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting approximately 30 minutes in a manner that the police officer E, who was called up for the above 112, was not in compliance with the measure of alcohol, he did not comply with it without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Registers of the use of drinking-free measuring instruments (List 4), circumstantial reports on the drivers of drinking-free instruments (List 5), and 112 Report Settlement List (List 13);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (list 6,8);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act and Article 148-2 (1) 2 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the selective punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was confession, reflectivity, and any criminal punishment for the last seven years.