Therefore, it is true that there are extenuating circumstances to consider part of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant is divided with the recognition of the crime of this case, and that there is no power to commit the crime of this case.

On the other hand, however, the act of arranging sexual traffic has great social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good sexual morals by commercializing women's sex, and preventing the proliferation of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and establishing a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to severely punish the business owner who operates illegal sexual traffic establishments. The period of the operation of the sexual traffic establishments in this case is longer than 11 months, and the defendant has committed the crime in this case even though he should respect the value and legal order of the Republic of Korea than foreigners who entered the Republic of Korea, in full view of various other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing and sentencing as shown in the arguments and records of this case, even if the defendant asserts as grounds for appeal, it is not recognized to be unfair because the punishment imposed by the court below is too excessive to the extent that the defendant should be reversed.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.