However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 29, 2015, at around 02:58, the Defendant opened a back door that is not corrected at the “D” restaurant for the operation of the victim C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and intruded into the door, and cut off the string by using the strings of the strings of the strings of the strings of the strings of the strings of the strings of the strings, and stolen the strings of the market price with cash equivalent to KRW 70,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of police seizure records and list statutes;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered as the following favorable circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is heavy in that the defendant, who was subject to a protective disposition multiple times for larceny and had the record of criminal punishment for the same crime, has intruded into the structure and stolen the object.

On the other hand, the fact of crime is recognized and wrong.

The damage was fully repaid and agreed with the victim.

In addition, it is also recognized that there is also a need for consideration to believe that the last appeal that the young children of the 20th early 20th early will live very soon.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings, a suspended sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed on the Defendant, and community service shall be added.