When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 30, 2014, around 16:40 on January 30, 2014, the Defendant’s “D” written indictment written in B, a defendant is deemed to be a clerical error.

In order to respond to the issue of money, the above B was aware of the existence of the above B B's 206 Ba Ba 206, and was removed from the 206 door of the above B's Ba 206 Ba Ba Ba 206 by using the prior Ba 206 Ba Ba Ba Ba 203, and the next time was known that the above B's Do 203 Ba Ba Ba 203 was not 206 but 203.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the e-mail 206 Ba 200,000 won of the victim E's market price, and damaged the above e-mail 203 entrance to the extent of the non-repair cost, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (12 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;