2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a police officer who was appointed as a policeman on July 13, 1991 and served as the head of the B police station investigation and criminal investigation team from July 19, 2013 to June 22, 2015.

B. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant issued a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) and violated Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 61 (Duty of Integrity), and 63 (Duty of Integrity) of the State Public Officials Act, following a resolution of the General Disciplinary Committee on Police Officers at B police Station, on October 20, 2015.

At around 01:30 on March 6, 2015, C’s voluntary release from a flagrant offender arrested (hereinafter “the ground for disciplinary action 1”) - C’s contact with C from the Chief of the Criminal Team (hereinafter “the criminal team leader”) and witness C’s arrival to a criminal team staff member and E box, and complied with C’s arrival to the E box, and “C has been doing so due to the C’s arrival,” and the circumstances leading up to the police box called “F was destroying and damaged the cab office phone,” and the guard of the police box called “the telephone machine is broken off.” However, F asked C to voluntarily release “I have failed to wear it,” but the circumstances leading up to the request of C’s release without any danger of injury and injury to C’s personal belongings.”

With respect to acceptance of bribe (hereinafter referred to as "grounds for disciplinary action 2") - around 13:34 March 6, 2015

3. On the 16:18th day of 18:18, after he was released from C to become aware that C is operating a maz establishment in Ulsan H, he became aware of the fact that C is operating the maz;

3. At around 16:00, the J proposed that “C will engage in Maba in the BJ’s office located in the Republic of Korea,” and proposed that “C will engage in Maba in the BJ’s office located in the GJ.”