A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the second floor house in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (road name address: the same Gu H and the next year “instant building”).

B. On April 16, 2012, the Defendant started the construction of the instant education center building and completed the said construction work on September 15, 2013, as a construction contractor awarded a contract for the new construction of C, D, E’s education hall building (2,664.36 square meters in total floor area, 664.36 square meters, 6 stories above ground, 1).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 4-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In full view of the appraiser G’s appraisal result (including the result of supplementary appraisal; hereinafter the same), the construction of this case expanded the existing cracks or water leakages of the building of this case due to the construction of this case, and new defects, such as the number of floors underground floors, have occurred. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the construction of this case, barring any special circumstances.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that he fulfilled his duty of care in the execution as a constructor, such as the construction of this case, by making full-time with the Safety Corporation to prevent damage to neighboring housing through prior safety diagnosis and measurement. However, the defendant's assertion is not sufficient to recognize that there was no more safe method that the defendant could have been able to take in the current construction and civil engineering technology, and there is no other evidence to support it. The defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of appraisal by G of expenses for repairing defects, appraiser, and appraiser, the instant building occurred.