요양급여대상 비급여대상 확인등 처분 및 사실조회에 대한 회신 취소, 변경
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Use of PRF" in Part 2, 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "Use of PRF"; "administrative action" in the 4, 1, and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "administrative action"; "Rules on Medical Care Benefits Standards" in Part 5, 13 is as "Rules on the Standards for Medical Care Benefits under National Health Insurance"; "the medical treatment act of this case" in the 6, 6, and 13 of the 7th judgment is as "the medical treatment act of this case"; "the Plaintiff is affected" in the 7th judgment to "the rights and obligations of the medical institution of this case" are as "the rights and obligations of the public law and the contents of the relevant laws and regulations are also effective to the Plaintiff."
Therefore, “I will not change “,” and only the facts alleged by the Plaintiff are changed to “I will,” and the 6th 19th am thereafter, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the part of the claim for cancellation of the instant notification constitutes a party suit, but the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant cannot be deemed as a party suit. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.
In addition, "other than adding, it is the same as the entry concerning the part concerning the claim for cancellation of the notice of this case among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of
2. The decision of the court of first instance is justified in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.