이주대책대상자제외처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance regarding this case are as follows: (a) the part of the first instance court’s “not later than the date of concluding a compensation contract or the date of a ruling of expropriation”; (b) the part of the first instance court’s “not later than the date of concluding a compensation contract or the date of a ruling of expropriation”; and (c) the part of “ December 5, 2012” in the 17th sentence as “by December 5, 2002”; and (d) the part of the first instance court’s reasoning is as stated in the grounds for the judgment, except for addition of the following supplementary judgments as to the allegations emphasized by the Plaintiff in the trial, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2)
(1) The Plaintiff filed an appeal and the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial. The Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial does not change from the first instance trial to the fact-finding and judgment. 【The Plaintiff’s disposition in this case, which the Plaintiff reported that the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for continuous residence, is legitimate, unless the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for continuous residence, is deemed lawful.”
2. The plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion.
Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.