If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

After raising living expenses by committing the crime of “Internet Goods Fraud” with Nonindicted Party B, the Defendant offered an account to receive money with the Internet CKafodi, and the Defendant posted a letter of sale of computer parts on the above CKaf page, and conspired to obtain money by communicating with the victims who reported the posted text.

Around 02:06 on October 2, 2018, the Defendant and B, according to the foregoing public offering, reported the sales text “I,” posted on the Internet Ckbook in the Daesung-dong D Housing E-dong, the Defendant concluded that I would sell the said Mkuri product in KRW 125,000,00 to the victim F.

However, in fact, the defendant and B did not possess the above mergic product, and it was thought that they will be used for the cost of living with the victim, so even if they receive the price of goods from the victim, they did not have the intention or ability to send the mergic product to the victim.

The Defendant and B received 125,000 won from the victim’s bank account (G) on the same day from the victim on the same day, and acquired 500,000 won in total from the victims four times, such as the list Nos. 3 through 6 of the crime list, from the date and time to August of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect B of each police officer;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written appeal and evidentiary materials;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, respectively, for the crime; the choice of each fine;

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above; and