However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 20, 2017, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee, and had the victim C get aboard and operate it to the rest area in the Han-dong Intersection located in the Hadong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and then did not pay 81,860 won to the taxi fee, and acquired the same amount of financial benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation is under suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the fact that the Defendant was committed in the instant crime, and that the degree of damage is not significant.

In this context, the sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, period of detention in prison, relationship with the mother's child, etc., shall be comprehensively considered and sentenced as the disposition.