If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around June 29, 2008, the Defendant altered a private document: (a) repaid KRW 13.6 million to C in front of the Sungnam-dong 102 Sung-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong; and (b) received KRW 13.6 million in the name of C.

On Oct. 1, 2012, the Defendant added the above receipt to “The previous receipt is null and void. The previous receipt is null and void on Jun. 29, 2008,” in order to exempt the Defendant from the obligation indicated in the letter of apology as of Apr. 1, 2008.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the defendant altered a receipt in C, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

2. Around October 18, 2012, the Defendant submitted a receipt altered as stated in paragraph 1 to the above court staff who may have knowledge of the fact that the receipt was altered as stated in paragraph 1 to the Suwon District Court Branch of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement made by C by a witness in the third protocol of trial;

1. Receipt of alteration;

1. Investigative Report (Attachment to Related Civil Judgment). A copy of the Decision 2012Ganam Branch of Suwon District Court 2012Da44791, 1 copy of the Decision 2013Na24256, 1 copy of the Decision 2013Na24256 and 1 copy of the Decision 2014Da16876 shall apply;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime, the choice of penalties, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;