2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.

A. From May 1, 1979 to June 30, 2012, the Defendant served as a researcher at the National Institute of Scientific Investigation in charge of document appraisal.

B. On August 28, 1998, C asserted that he purchased a private taxi from D representing the Plaintiff, and filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on August 28, 1998 against the Plaintiff for the implementation of the procedure for changing the name of license for private taxi transport business under the Seoul District Court 98Kahap16034, and submitted a letter, cash storage certificate, and the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression, etc. written in the name of the Plaintiff in the lawsuit above

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff asserted that the above documents submitted as documentary evidence were forged and submitted to the Namyang-gu Police Station. At the request of the chief of the Namyang-gu Police Station, E and the Defendant, who worked as a researcher of the National Science Investigation Institute at the time, conducted an appraisal of the above documents and the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression, etc. on December 13, 199, prepared a written appraisal that the Plaintiff’s signature and seal impression of the above documents are identical with the Plaintiff’s written evidence and the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression (hereinafter “instant appraisal”).

In the instant case, the Plaintiff was indicted on July 25, 2013, under the charge that “U.S. District Court rendered false testimony that C did not alter the cited portion affixed with the certificate of the personal seal impression in the name of the Plaintiff in collusion with D” (U.S.) and submitted a false complaint to the police officer on the charge that “The Plaintiff was indicted on July 25, 2013, U.S. District Court Ansan Branch No. 2006Da1661, Jun. 25, 2013 (hereinafter “instant judgment”).