손해배상
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On June 4, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff entered one-lane to turn to the left from the TIC bank (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff-Appellant”) from the JIC bank on the side of the JIC bank. Around that time, the Defendant: (a) driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle from the TIC bank to the JIC bank in Seocho-gu Seoul; and (b) intentionally collision the Plaintiff’s vehicle while driving the vehicle from the TIC bank to the JIC bank; and (c) caused the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the Plaintiff, by intentionally conflicting the Plaintiff’s vehicle by breaching the signal; (d) the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages for medical expenses of KRW 5 million, nursing expenses of KRW 2,00,000, nursing expenses of KRW 2,000, KRW 20,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 3000,000, KRW 3000,000, and damages for delay.
2. As to whether the Defendant intentionally conflicts with the Plaintiff’s vehicle in violation of the signal as alleged by the Plaintiff, health class, and evidence evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 7 are not believed, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, in full view of the witness C’s testimony and the fact inquiry result with respect to the Seocho Police Station of this court, the Plaintiff’s left the part of the Plaintiff vehicle in violation of the signal at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Costco distance on June 4, 2012, while driving the Plaintiff vehicle at the Seocheon-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and making a left-hand turn in violation of the signal at the Seocheon-gu, Seoul, as well as the fact that the Defendant’s claim for collision of the Plaintiff vehicle by the Defendant’s Skick vehicle in violation of the signal is recognized, and therefore, it is not reasonable to consider the Plaintiff’s claim on the premise that the Defendant intentionally conflicts with the Plaintiff’s vehicle.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.