beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.11.07 2018고단372

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around June 29, 2017, at the office of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Co., Ltd.”), the Defendant would pay the price at the end of each month, if he/she supplies gold typists.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had no particular property, and there was a situation in which the obligation equivalent to KRW 3 billion has already been accumulated in the situation where the Defendant had been supplied by the customers with new services and repaid part of the existing obligations. Therefore, there was no intention or ability to pay the price normally even if the Defendant received the delivery from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 50 gold bullions equivalent to KRW 4,390,191 at the market price on July 27, 2017 from the victim, and obtained 3,382 from around that time to August 25, 2017, a total of 307,641,129 won from around 30 times, as shown in the crime sight table.

"2018 Highest 693" defendant is a substantial representative of in-house director in the Co., Ltd. that sells other fish.

The Defendant, at the above C Office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul around July 30, 2017, may supply the “KU50 TU50 T at a low price” to the victim G operating F Co., Ltd., a motor vehicle parts company.

KU50 Doz. 3,00 Doz. said, “The full amount of the goods price to be deposited shall be deposited at the place desired until August 8, 2017.”

However, in fact, the defendant had 910 parts following the KU50 at the time and did not have 3,000 parts, and there is no other way to procure money from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to supply other terms even if he receives money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on July 31, 2017, transferred from the injured party to the H bank account under the above C’s name, and deducted the price of 303,773,400 won (which actually holds 910 other households from among them) as the price.