When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 10:50 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant found a female on the ground that the said victim was not the Defendant’s body, “E” under the “E” operated by the victim D (Woo, 56 years of age) in Ysan City, and stated that “this Chewing baby, this sublime is the same as that of the Defendant’s body,” and the Defendant saw the victim’s breath on the floor, thereby destroying the victim’s breath on the floor, and booming the Defendant’s chest part of the Defendant’s chest on the charge of the investigation, but was corrected ex officio in accordance with the result of the examination of evidence.

In several times, the facts charged are stated as "at least five times to fice," which reads the head of the victim F (n, 45 years of age) who was horsed on the side and moves over the floor," but the facts charged were corrected ex officio in accordance with the results of the examination of evidence.

In order to provide the victim D with 14-day medical treatment for 14 days, the victim F was injured by multiple scamba (dual, scamba, scamba), etc., and the victim F was injured by multiple scamba (dual, scamba, scamba, and scamba) which require 14-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or F;

1. Videos of CCTV-recording video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis certificate (investigative records 33,34 pages);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion is that the victim unilaterally committed an assault from the victims, and there was no other fact when the victims were involved, such as the facts charged. However, there was only a fact that the victim's hair was inevitably sealed to avoid assault by the victim F.

2. In full view of the above evidence examined by this court, the facts constituting the crime in the judgment are recognized, so the defendant and the defendant are all recognized.