However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 25, 2019, from around 00:50 to August 25, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s singing practice room by force, and interfered with the victim’s operation of singing practice room by force. In D operated by the victim C, the victim, etc., expressed a bath to the victim, took a beer disease on the floor, booming the victim’s blaps, and driving away the victim from other rooms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing the case-related photographs

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service, the main sentence of Article 62-2(1), Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc. [Decision of Punishment] - Type 1 (Interference with Business] [Special Embrying Persons] - The mitigated area of [Decision of Recommendation] the mitigated area / [Scope of Recommendation] January - August / 8 [Decision of Recommendation] / The above sentencing person and the defendant are found to have a risk of repeating a crime in light of the criminal records, criminal methods, etc., the defendant is judged to have a risk of repeating a crime, degree of tangible power exercised by the defendant, etc.