A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 8,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant, at around 23:30, driven the E-7 car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.216% at the section of approximately 200 meters of alcohol in front of the water bath in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Incheon at around 343, in front of the water bath in the East Sea.

B. On March 28, 2017, at around 23:48, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) G, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station F District of the Incheon Southern Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 regarding the Defendant’s drinking operation; (c) refusing to measure alcohol consumption; (d) having the chest of the said G; and (e) having the chest carried the said G’s breast in hand; and (e) having the said H’s breast in hand carried it over by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

(c)

When the Defendant refused to take a drinking test at the same time and place as the above B/L statement, it is erroneous that the Defendant reported it to the police by the victim I (19 years old) who was under his/her command, thereby leading the victim to the injury.

“Abrupted” and assaulted the victim’s neck by having it pushed by hand.

2. Defendant B’s defect in the foregoing G and the above H in the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph 1-b, and in the same manner and place as described in paragraph 1-B, intended to make a drinking test to A; and

A 200 20 20 20 20 20

“The above part of H’s title is sealed by hand, and the above part of the H’s title was expressed as “this dog.” The chest part was pushed by hand to the above G, and the chest part was pushed by hand, and the above H may be arrested to interfere with the performance of official duties if the Defendant continues to exist.

“Although it was notified that it was “, it was assaulted, such as disregarding and continuing desireing the said H’s bath.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, H and J;

1. I, .