Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of facts constituting the crime as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “influort purpose”

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.