beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.08.21 2013고단799

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 6 months, and Defendant X’s imprisonment of 8 months, respectively.

Defendant

U.S.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to six years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Daegu District Court on December 10, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 13, 201, and on May 23, 2013, the Daegu High Court sentenced four years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Daegu High Court on May 23, 2013, and became final and conclusive on August 23,

Defendant

B was sentenced to four years of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Daegu District Court on January 10, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 13, 201, and on May 23, 2013, the Daegu High Court sentenced two years of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and decided on August 23, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A, Defendant A, and Defendant B are married couple, and they are parties to the dispute settlement agreement set up for the purpose of the fund-raising business on or around December 18, 2003, the F in charge of the dispute settlement agreement set up for the same purpose on August 2, 2004, the actual operator of the G in charge of the dispute settlement agreement set up for the same purpose on or around April 28, 2005, and Defendant X are planning directors of the fund-raising company.

With respect to approximately 27,00,000 square meters of the site in Daegu Suwon-gu K, the Defendants explained as if they were able to carry on apartment construction project by obtaining permission from the competent authority, the Seongbuk-gu Office, the competent authority, and conspired to attract investment money.

Defendant

around July 2006, X made a false statement to the effect that “AC building located in the Dong-gu, Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, would reduce the authorization and permission from the Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu Office on the site purchased in order to carry out apartment project. However, many subsequent measures were required, and the investors who paid the investment money will set up a collateral security on the K site and pay twice the investment money within two months.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have obtained the authorization or permission from the Sung-gu Office to carry out apartment execution projects.