2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The head of the Defendant, the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (the head of the Defendant), changed the urban planning of a zone for the housing site development project of DM on around 2002, according to the plan to create an information media industrial complex in the name of "digital media market" on the land of 569,742 square meters of land in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 200, which was established in May 3, 200, and published the supply of DM land through the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Development Corporation on May 16, 2002.

B. The J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) filed an application for the supply of the DMM business site with the participation of the German universities and research institutes in DMC, and the Defendant selected J as a supply recipient and sold DM’s business site on April 15, 2003, and sold MM’s business site and N’s business site on April 30, 2004, respectively.

(hereinafter “instant supply contract”). C.

J around May 4, 2004, around 2004, the first complex and the second complex building (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the building of this case") to be newly constructed for the above M and N were approved by the public announcement of the invitation of occupants and started the recruitment of occupants around that time.

Plaintiff

B From June 16, 2004 to June 16, 2004, the rest of the plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with J on the commercial building in the instant building (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) as listed below (hereinafter collectively “instant sales contract”); and on August 16, 2007, Plaintiff B succeeded to the supply value of 1/2 shares among the commercial buildings sold in lots by A on June 16, 2004, P 437,950,003 C C on June 16, 2003 C on July 6, 2004 to Q 632,240,000,004 DD 1,06,004 D on June 14, 14, 2004 to G 1, 096, 405, 15, 18, 146, 205, 146, 2005, 14, 2004

J around August 2007, the construction of the building of this case.