A. The victim E, who is a misunderstanding of facts, of the defendant's birth (hereinafter "victim") takes the breath of alcohol at the funeral hall of the mother's mother, and breath of the defendant's mother, and breath of the defendant's breath of the defendant's breath of the defendant's breath of the defendant's breath of the defendant's breath of the defendant's mother.

B. In light of the fact that the crime of this case of unfair sentencing was the cause for the victim to take the trial expenses first, the dispute between the place of punishment, and the Defendant’s economic situation is difficult, the punishment imposed by the court below (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts are: (i) the victim has consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that the victim was the victim's face by drinking the victim's face; (ii) the witness G (the victim's wife), F (the defendant and the victim's remaining birth) also consistently made a statement to the effect that it conforms to the victim's statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below; (iii) the victim was diagnosed by the victim that the victim was the inner left part of the hospital on the day, the ability to develop the victim's face; and (iv) the victim's face on the day of this case can be confirmed with the victim's face or with a hacker's face; and (v) the victim's face on the day of this case can be identified with the victim's face or with a hacker's face.