교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who has operated a Dbee or a car owned by ASEAN for business purposes.
On September 16, 2015, around 10:57, 10:57, the franchising of the Yongsan-dong in Yannam-si, and the flow of the Ne-distance Road was made from the four-distance flusing side of the glusium to the flusence of the glus
At the same time, the signal was installed at the distance intersection.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with his/her own name and prevent any traffic accident.
Nevertheless, while neglecting this and proceeding with signal violations on the two-lanes, the left turn safely to the left in accordance with the straight line from the front side of the above beer or the car at that time to the home flusing side of the two-lanes.
E Driving conflicts with the top top wheel of the Fwork and the top quile part of the E Driving.
As a result, the above Vietnamesor car winners G suffered from the injury of the chest spellete, etc. requiring four weeks' medical treatment, and the above rocketing car drivers E suffered from the injury of the chest pele, etc. requiring two weeks' medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Application of traffic accident report, actual survey report, accident vehicle and field photographs, driver's license ledger, and Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of accident;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the Provisional Payment Order is often divided by the accused in depth, the victims do not want the punishment of the accused, the defendant has no record of committing any crime, the defendant's health condition is not good, and it is extremely difficult to economicly.