beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.07.20 2017고단1115

도로교통법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 60,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 60,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2017, around 10:43, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle of the “D” in front of the “D” located in Kimpo-si, and (b) was in front of the “D” and was in front of the two-lanes in front of the air route, and was in front of the two-lanes, the Defendant violated the traffic safety facilities by disregarding the Defendant’s direction stop signal at the above intersection and passing it through the said intersection as it is, and subsequently, went through the said intersection.

[At the time, only after the defendant had already changed the signal of the defendant's moving direction to the above intersection, entered the above intersection, and controlled the defendant as a violation of signal by entering the above intersection, and passing through the above intersection. At the time, the defendant asked the defendant to cut off or cut off a minor crime Sticker and did not call that he did not violate signal. At the time, the statement made by police officers F to the effect that the defendant does not control the signal violation in the situation where there is doubt for ordinary objection, is consistent from the point of control to the present time, and the statement made at that time and before and after it is specific, consistent with the signal system or structure, etc., and it is sufficiently recognized that the above crime by the defendant was committed. In addition to the evidence duly adopted and investigated in this court, the above crime by the defendant is fully recognized.

In addition, the Defendant stated that he was only passing through the intersection in which he had been aware of at the time when he acquired the driver’s license, and that he was merely passing through the intersection promptly. However, in light of the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s speech and behavior at the time of regulating the Defendant, the Defendant repeatedly stated to the effect that “it would be well aware of it, so I would like to change the evidence,” even while he was investigated by the police around April 5, 2017, when he was dissatisfied with the instant case.