손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person operating solar power generation business, etc., and the Defendant is a juristic person operating new and renewable energy business, solar energy power generation facility business, etc.
B. The concept of facilities related to solar power generation facilities is as follows:
Solar dlars: Electricity generated from individual solar batteries simultaneously in the form of combining solar batteries by linking solar batteries with species and crossings.
c. As such, solar light can be dried up to make solar light (e.g., solar energy rupture, which would normally be disadvantageous to solar energy).
C. Connection group: A device that combines the straight power generated from solar light boilers with the power required in the system by connecting it to a straight line, and transmits it to a black line. In the form of electricity that can be used in the real life by converting the power generated in the direct flow form from solar cycle to an exchange. The power generated from solar light can be transmitted to a black line after turning it into a connected line through cable.
C. On March 6, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the supply of the PCB plate (PCB plate), which is a component of solar power connection teams, and was supplied by the Defendant with the access 1 channel (CH) from August 14, 2014 to December 24, 2014.
After manufacturing the connection base by using the connection reflected installed by the Defendant, the Plaintiff installed it in the solar power plant B located in the Y-si, Young-si. On January 6, 2015, a fire (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred at the solar connecting base installed on the roof of the said power plant.
【In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 3-1 through 8, Gap evidence 1-3, Eul evidence 1-2, 9-2, and 3-3, the fact fact inquiry results on the racing and fire extinguishing of this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s fire was first emitted from the connection racks, which is the case.