Three copies of the number of notes issued by the Bank of Korea among those referred to in subparagraph 1 shall be the victim B.

On April 10, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to one year by the Changwon District Court for larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on June 21, 2019.

At around 15:07 on June 23, 2019, the Defendant committed theft with property equivalent to 1,040,000 won in total, including 1,70,000 won in cash, 30,50,000 won in cash, and 1,040,000 won in the market price of the victim's possession in the west of the clothes, through the cresh of the victim's house, which was opened by using the cresh of the victim's house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. On-site photographs, on-site ctv screen images, each ctv course photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc. inquiry reports, investigation reports (in compliance with the confirmation of whether the period of repeated crime of a suspect is confirmed), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (current status of personal confinement);

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 333 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the Return of Victims (three copies which have been stolen by the defendant);

1. As to the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 333(2) and Article 333(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for Issuing Victims (excluding those subject to issuance since the sale price of 870,000 won out of 870,000 won which was stolen by the Defendant, and the remaining KRW 20,000,000, which was confiscated by mixing with the cash owned by the Defendant) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defense counsel asserts that the Defendant took drugs at the time of the instant crime and was in a state of mental and physical disability. However, in light of the circumstances indicated in the record, such as the background of the crime and the Defendant’s behavior before and after the crime, it appears that the Defendant had a state