2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On May 1, 2016, at around 07:30, the Defendant came to be a vision for the reason that he had galkings of the victim D (year 21) in front of the Dong-gu Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, about 07:30, and that she would come to be a place suitable for the victim, and the victim went to the Defendant.

While the Defendant arrived at the F parking lot located in the same Gu E with approximately 150 meters away from the above place, and was in a dispute with the victim, the Defendant made indecent act by force against the victim by the victim, stating that “the victim caused a collapse.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on investigation (the result of the verification of CCTV for crime) and a report on investigation (the CCTV verification of spits) [the defendant and his/her defense counsel are denied that he/she suffers from the victim D, such as the crime in the judgment of the court below. However, if the statements of the witness, including the victim, are generally consistent and consistent with the facts charged, they shall not be rejected without permission, unless there is any separate evidence to deem the credibility of the statements made by the witness objectively and objectively, and there is no consistency in the statements made by the witness in the major part. The credibility of the statements made by the witness is not arbitrarily denied (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012; 2007Do10728, Mar. 14, 2008; 2007Do10728, Mar. 14, 2008).