However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On July 14, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court on July 14, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On October 12, 2019, at around 18:40, the Defendant driven a D-to-purd vehicle at approximately 20km from the front of the new intersection road located in the Posi-gu, Nam-si, Nam-si, in the state of alcohol of 0.131% of blood alcohol concentration.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (a copy of a summary order of the same attached power);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, the degree of blood alcohol concentration, and the records of being punished twice as fines for driving under the influence of alcohol prior to the instant case shall be taken into account);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (in addition to the grounds for discretionary mitigation, consideration shall be given to the absence of any record of punishment heavier than that of the suspended execution);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;