물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 22,532,071 as well as its annual 6% from April 6, 2016 to August 17, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, 2-1, 2-2, and 3-1, and 2 of the evidence Nos. 1-1, 2-2, the plaintiff is a juristic person whose business purpose is the import and sale business of food, etc., and the defendant is a juristic person whose business purpose is the general trade business of food, etc., the plaintiff is a juristic person, around April 2015, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with a white paper, and the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant to pay the price to the defendant by the end of the month of supply, and the plaintiff supplied the price to the defendant by the last day of the month of the supply, and the fact that the plaintiff supplied the price to the defendant from the time to December 17, 2015 that the price of the goods that the defendant did not pay to the plaintiff is KRW 32,532,071, respectively, and there is no counter-proof.
2. If so, the Defendant is liable to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 22,532,071 won (32,532,071 won - 10,000,000 won) and the rate of 15% per annum under the Commercial Act from April 6, 2016 to August 17, 2016, which is obvious from the day following the day when the instant payment order under the Plaintiff was served to the Defendant as the day when the payment order under the Plaintiff was served to the Defendant, as the last day of the last month to which the payment order under the Plaintiff was served.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking its implementation is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.