When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 26, 2013, the Defendant extended money to the Defendant’s D stores operated by the Defendant, which was located in Ansan-si, for a period of up to September 26, 2013, to the Defendant for the Defendant’s operation, that is, the Defendant did not make profits. However, the Defendant would make a full payment of the time limit money to the Defendant on the one-month basis, as the money to be used as monthly rent and material cost is required.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the injured party.

The defendant, as a result of a loan from the injured party, in other words, the 1.2 million won and 200,000 won with the agricultural bank account under the name of the defendant, in the name of the injured party

9. Around 30,00 won, around 36 million won, around 10 October of the same year, around 2 million won, around 2,000 won, around 15 October of the same year, and KRW 9,350,000,00 in total.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement of F in the police interrogation protocol concerning the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of investigation reports (detailed statement of transactions in the F Depository Account, the complainant) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;