2. It is true that there are circumstances that can be taken into account such as the Defendant’s confession and reply to the trial for the first time, the Defendant’s initial crime and the fact that the economic situation is not good. However, the Defendant’s “W” in this case employs juvenile M (man, 14 years old) as a part-time entertainment loan while operating a dan, which is a juvenile harmful business establishment, in the trade name. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as sentencing precedents in similar cases and equity with co-defendants for whom the judgment is rendered final and conclusive in the amount of KRW 5 million, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant cannot be deemed to have been imposed.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.