When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 16, 2013, the defendant injured the victim's reputation by openly stating the false fact on the bulletin board of the Senior Citizens' Organization, "The Chairperson of the Senior Citizens Association embezzled 300,000 won as a result of the audit," although the victim D, the chairperson of the Senior Citizens Association, has not embezzled the government subsidy granted to the Senior Citizens' Association, the chairperson of the Senior Citizens' Association, in spite of the fact that the victim D, the chairperson of the Senior Citizens' Association, had not embezzled the government subsidy granted to the Senior Citizens' Association."

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Grade D of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement;

1. Books of subscription to and withdrawal from each senior citizen's political affairs, passbooks of each account, copies of account books, details of transactions by account, and bulletin board photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion regarding the defendant's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is asserted that the defendant alleged a true fact for the public interest of the members of the Senior Citizens' Association. Thus, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant is doubtful that the chairperson of the Senior Citizens' Association is not transparent in the management of the fund although the chairperson of the Senior Citizens' Association did not have embezzled the subsidy, and the defendant's assertion is rejected.