However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 6, 2020, from around 01:30 on the same day to around 09:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the victim C was under the influence of alcohol at the DNA telecom administered by the victim C in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City from around July 6, 2020 to around 09:30 on the same day; (c) the Defendant walked a telephone over several occasions on several occasions; (d) took a bath at the telecom; and (e) took a large volume of the telecom with the above telecom, and (e) requested the employees of the telecom to open the guest room room; and (e) the Defendant moved to the guest room, and (e) took the head of E with his hand, and continued in the vehicle of another customer parked at the apartment parking lot;

In response to contact contact, it interfered with the victim C's management of the telecom by force, such as making a series of calls.

2. On July 6, 2020, around 10:19, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report on the ground of the act described in paragraph (1) in front of the F convenience store located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and confirmed the details of the report from Ha, etc., affiliated with G District of the Incheon Southern Police Station G District, the Defendant: (b) caused the disturbance under the influence of alcohol to avoid a violation of the Punishment Act; and (c) continuously prevented H from imposing the penalty two times in order to notify the violation of the Punishment Act; and (d) continuously prevented H from imposing the penalty two times the chest of H by hand; (d) caused H to the Defendant’s body in two arms; and (e) caused H to do so, “F to bit bit f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the notification of penalties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police made by the defendant to H in the court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV images to C and E’s written images;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.