위증
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.
provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[Basic Facts] At around 23:50 on January 17, 2018, Defendant B: (a) discovered that Defendant A was in the dwelling of Defendant B, one of his own domestic women under the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Cloan D; and (b) threatened Defendant B, who was hiding himself in a toilet where he was damaged, with the network E, that he was sworn, and who was hiding in a toilet where he was damaged, the network of this case that threatened Defendant B, “ soon ba. Ba. Ba. Ba. Ba. Ba.” was concealed in Defendant B’s toilet (three floors) and died by opening a window and leaving.
Defendant A was subject to an investigation by an investigative agency in relation to the case, and Defendant A made several statements at the police investigation immediately after the instant case that Defendant B had expressed to the deceased E that it would have a threat. However, Defendant B did not reverse the subsequent statement and the subsequent prosecutorial investigation up to the time of the prosecution investigation, and Defendant B maintained the statement consistently reversed that there was no fact corresponding to Defendant B and the statement, and Defendant B rejected Defendant B’s suspicion with the same purport.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On November 5, 2018, Defendant B told the said Party A to the effect that “In today’s testimony, I dar the testimony as he was investigated by an investigative agency” by walking the phone from the said Party in the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and had the said Party present himself as a witness of the Defendant’s intimidation case, and had the Defendant present himself at the Defendant’s meeting as a witness of the Defendant’s intimidation, and had the Defendant feel to the effect that he did not have a fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor, with respect to the said case.”