The seized Nos. 4 (Outwards), Nos. 5 (insular towers) and Nos. 7 (g. g. g.s.).

At around 02:00 on January 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was a victim’s mobile phone in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, for the reason that a person suffering from female-friendly job offering who has hedgingd in front of the studio of the victim D (n, 23 years of age) in Dongdaemun-gu, did not have the Defendant, but rather has the Defendant, and on the ground that he or she makes a false statement, he or she shall be held liable for the Defendant’s actions on the part of the victim’s mobile phone. He or she is clearly given a letter of call.

The remainder is that the sender sent the text message "I am all the responsibility, I am to transmit the victim's body pictures, and is punished if I am the defendant's scrying and scrying it."

In addition, the victim threatened the victim as if he/she spreads his/her photograph by putting his/her photograph on the apartment in which the studio house and the studner’s studio studio studio studio studio straw.” The victim threatened him/her with a total of four times from that to February 2016, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry in the complaint, and each police statement protocol against D;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of monetary details of a victim), and a criminal investigation report;

1. Images of each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to gallons Nos. 4 (O.m. Haddboards), 5 (O.m. 5) and gallons 7 (O.m. 3);

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are divided by mistake.

However, by using the victim's photograph that is extremely difficult to disclose without self-regulation, the victim has threatened not only the victim but also the mother of the victim to transmit his/her photograph to the victim.

On May 1, 2016, the victim deposited KRW 10 million with the victim on May 11, 2016, but the victim seems to refuse to receive the request and is still trying to punish the defendant.

2.2