When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of liquor at C stores located in Daegu Suwon-gu B on November 22, 2017, and (b) received 112 reports from his/her employees to check the damage inflicted on the said employees; (b) the Defendant reported that E, a police officer belonging to the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station D District Branch, dispatched after receiving 12 reports from his/her employees; and (c) had been discharged from E.

A bit of bitch fluor, dead, shall be discarded.

D. D. D. D. D., D. D.’s bath, E’s left-hand f.m., and E’s left-hand f.m., obstructed a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, etc., and at the same time, k.e., k., knenee-pas who need to be treated for about two weeks to E.m.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of diagnostic certificates, statutes governing standing photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a punishment as ordered in consideration of the following factors: (a) the crime of this case was committed against a police officer in the course of performing official duties by obsing him/her and assaulting him/her; (b) the nature of the crime is not good; (c) the defendant reflects him/her; (d) the police officer E desires to be subject to an apology from the defendant; (e) the defendant did not have any criminal record beyond a fine; and (e) the defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and circumstances after the crime was committed.