In light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s overall involvement in the operation of the instant sexual traffic business establishment, such as meeting and employing female employees and managing business profits, and the commission of sexual traffic is highly harmful to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women’s sex; (b) there is a need to strictly punish the party who operates the instant sexual traffic business; and (c) the Defendant appears to have obtained considerable profits in managing the instant sexual traffic business establishment; and (d) considering various sentencing conditions that are shown in the instant pleadings, such as the method of the instant crime, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and the Defendant’s age and character and conduct, even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the punishment of the lower court is deemed unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.