However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 00:20 on June 26, 2018, the victim D, who was a wife in front of the warehouse of the wife C parking lot in Yongsan-si, shall not be able to respond to the Defendant’s “work club meals and fluently fluent fluent fluents,” while fluening the complaints related to the drinking fluents to the Defendant’

“ ..... ........... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ........ ...............

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283 (1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation [the scope of the recommended sentence] The sentencing range of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is determined as the order in consideration of the following circumstances and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, where the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year), the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year), the punishment of a person who is not specially mitigated), or considerable damage was recovered (including efforts to recover damage):

- The fact that there is the same criminal history with respect to the victim - the reflective point, the fact that the victim agreed with, and the fact that there is no criminal history exceeding the fine.