However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On June 29, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of KRW 4 million from the Ulsan District Court to a crime such as violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Ulsan District Court to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. on March 12, 2013, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 07:40 on August 2, 2015, and driven C Poter truck with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.079% at a distance of about 10km from the head of Ulsan-gu B to the head of Ulsan-gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the control of drinking driving, report on the state of drinking, and notification on the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses, and car4;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc., inquiry reports and investigation reports (attached to a summary order for the same type of crime of a suspect);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are not less than those applied to recidivism despite a majority of the same records as the reasons for sentencing, the punishment as the order shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, and the sentencing conditions as shown in the records.