However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person who was in a name in the name of the Defendant, “When sending a e-mail card, he would create a e-mail passbook by raising credit rating by accumulating financial transaction performance; and (b) was unable to obtain a low-interest credit loan in a normal way; (c) lent a accessible medium connected to the Defendant’s account to a person who was in a name in an unlawful manner; and (d) accumulated transaction performance by submitting it as reference to the Defendant’s normal transaction performance; and (e) subsequently, accepted the fraud of receiving a credit loan by submitting it as reference to the Defendant’s normal transaction performance.

On June 26, 2017, the Defendant sent one copy of the physical card connected to the Saemaul Treasury Account (C) in the name of the Defendant from the Defendant’s company located in Kimhae-si B via a door-to-door officer, and notified the physical card password by telephone.

Accordingly, the Defendant lent the access media for the purpose of using the above crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on personal information and account transaction details;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which the punishment is chosen (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is in depth of his mistake as a principal offender, and that the defendant has no benefit from