On January 30, 2020, at around 22:55, the Defendant: (a) took a horse dispute with C, a workplace club in the front of Leecheon-si B lending; and (b) was the Defendant, on the ground that the victim D (the age of 52) who is a workplace club in relation to the said horse dispute said C and D dynasium, the Defendant said D dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium at any time; (c) “Wumna dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Attachment of a medical certificate for injury);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Six to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] violent crimes; and < by Act No. 658, Feb. 2, 199; Act No. 1054, Feb. 29, 2000>

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, the Defendant left the victim’s head by a brick, which is a very dangerous behavior and is also difficult to understand the motive for committing a crime.

In addition, the victim did not take any measures for the recovery of damage.

In addition, the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes.

However, the degree of injury suffered by the victim was not serious.

The sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into account such circumstances, the defendant's age, character, environment, and circumstances after the crime.