When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 23:20 on October 17, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station D police station, which was dispatched to the site after having received a report that the Defendant avoided the disturbance under the influence of alcohol, on the part of the Defendant, by referring the victim E, who was a police officer belonging to the said restaurant proprietor F, etc., to “whether the said gue is a police officer,” and “a investigation was conducted on the part of the friende, friend, flaps, flap, flap, etc.,” and “a friende of friend, farch, flap, etc., of the farch farch.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;