When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C Rab car owned by the defendant's mother B.

On August 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on August 19, 2015, and continued to drive the vehicle under this title, title 1-20, title 20-3, title 1-3, title 20-4, title 20-7, title 20

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive as ordered by signal apparatus, due to negligence that is in progress by violating signal on the front color signal, and the part on the left side of the victim D (73 years old) who gets a bicycle on the right side of the defendant's driving direction to the left side of the bicycle side of the victim D (73 years old) who gets a bicycle on the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian name was driven by the defendant.

Ultimately, the victim suffered injury, such as the 8th left-hand body, which requires treatment for about 4 weeks due to such occupational negligence, such as a cage cage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A medical certificate (D);

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (actual survey report);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident-related photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Sentencing sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the degree of injury inflicted on the victim by the instant crime on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order shall not be less than that of the instant crime; the instant traffic accident occurred due to the Defendant’s signal violation on the crosswalk; the Defendant led to the Defendant’s confession; the Defendant was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance at the time of the instant crime; the Defendant’s age, the degree of the Defendant’s negligence, the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime