Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles) The Defendant has been going to make a statement as stated in the judgment of the court below (hereinafter “instant remarks”), and then, it should not impair C’s honor by receiving a invitation from the C group that is provokinging down the efficial group across the country, and receiving it, and being treated or misleading. In the future, the public officials concerned refrain from doing this act, and make a statement to the effect that C’s length can be left by means of a efficiencies of history, culture, and loyalty that C’s name. In the future, it is unreasonable to determine that the Defendant did not make a statement in this part of the reasoning that the lower court failed to do so.

B) The Defendant’s primary purpose of the instant statement was to make a statement to the effect that the C-Gun public officials, representing C-Gun and accompanying the participants in the sisterhood alliance, should refrain from doing so, which constitutes “when public interest” under Article 310 of the Criminal Act, and thus, illegality is excluded. 2) Punishment (fine 3 million won) sentenced by the lower court of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

나. 검사(사실오인) 원심에서 이유무죄로 판단한 부분과 관련하여, 피고인이 적시한 사실 중 중요부분인 ‘똥꼬치마를 입었다’, ‘껴안고 부르스를 췄다’는 부분은 K이 피고인에게 말한 ‘항상 짧은 치마를 입고 다닌다’, ‘어깨동무를 하고 춤은 춘 사실이 있다’는 부분과 전혀 다른 행위태양으로 이를 두고 피고인이 단순히 들었던 사실을 과장했다고 보기는 어려운 점, 피고인이 사실관계를 파악한 적이 없는 점, 사실과 다른 사실을 적시한 점 등에 비추어 볼 때, 피고인은 이 사건 발언이 허위라는 사실을 미필적으로나마 인식하였다고 봄이...