However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, at around 21:50 on December 9, 2016, was able to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) the Defendant, while taking part in the dispute with D’s drinking E while drinking alcohol together in D’s danran bar operated by the Victim C, he was able to take part in the disturbance, (b) the victim scam and scam the Defendant, and (c) the victim scam the scam, and (c) the scams scam on the floor, scaming the scam of the scam and scaming the scam of the scam and scaming the scam on the floor of the main entrance of the scam.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the principal operation of the victim by force between approximately 30 minutes.

2. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested in a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the duties in front of the “D” ran tavern as indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article; and (b) was transferred to the Jeju Police Station G District in the Jeju Police Station in Jeju Island on the same day at around 22:45 on the same day; and (c) was under the influence of alcohol, and (d) was under the influence of alcohol, “H dogs, the independence of the police, and whether the police took place in the Japanese colonial era.”

He spits the floor by spiting off the table of the G District Office by walking the table of the table in the G District Office. Then, around December 9, 2016, at the Jeju Police Station located in the Dong-ro, Jeju Island, he spite the table of the G District, and spite the table in front of the Jeju Police Station located in the Dong-ro, Dong-ro, Dong-ro, Dong-dong, G District, and I walk the above I’s left face one time with his left face on the left side on December 10, 2016, and 00:10 on December 10, 2016, he spited the Dong-dong Police Station at the protection room of the Jeju Police Station, and spited it one time with his head on the left hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officials concerning criminal investigation and the maintenance of order in the detention room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Written statements of C, J and K;

1. Investigation report (Submission of related video images);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.