2. The judgment does not have the same type of criminal offense as the instant crime, and there is no criminal conviction for the Defendant, the Defendant is against the Defendant’s health while making a confession of all the instant crimes, and the fact that the Defendant appears to be not good, etc. is favorable to the Defendant, but the nature of the instant crime, which acquired money from the victim by taking advantage of trust relationship, is not good, even though the Defendant has long passed since the crime was committed, the damage was not completely recovered, and the Defendant did not take any practical measures to recover damage, and the Defendant did not take any measures to summon several times in the course of the investigation and trial, and the Defendant did not comply with summons, and other various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation and family environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., do not seem to be unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.