However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on October 10, 2011.

The above defendants

A. At around 22:00 on December 1, 2012, 201, it was sent to the intercompeting telecom, B, and one-time sexual intercourse, located in the Dae-si Si Mapo-si Mapo-si Mapo-si Mapo-si Mapo-si.

B. On December 23, 2012, around 01:00, the EMoMobur 702 room located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D MaMobur 02 located in the Songpa-gu D Mabur 202, and the 1st sexual intercourse with the above B.

2. Defendant B knew that the above Defendant was a spouse of the above Defendant B, and even at each time and place described in paragraph (1) above, the above Defendant had sexual intercourse with A twice as mentioned above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of the suspect against the defendant A (including the defendant B's statement);

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. C Complaints;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Defendant A of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act: The first sentence of Article 241 of the Criminal Act: The latter part of Article 241 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1)(Article 62(1)(Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act) (Article 62(1)(Article 62(1)(Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act