When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Damage to property;

A. On April 24, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:00 on April 24, 2015, damaged reading centers equivalent to KRW 20,00,00 at the market price owned by the victim by the victim of the victim D (e.g., the victim of the de facto marriage 104) (e., the 46 years of age) who was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim due to the problem that the victim would face a dispute.

B. On April 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) removed the victim’s market price, which was installed at a small room window that did not open the door door and open the door to the police station and destroyed the victim’s window, by putting the victim’s house in his/her hand, at the same place as around 19:50 on April 26, 2015, where the victim, such as the paragraph (a), was pushed the Defendant on the same day on the same day; and (b) reported 112 on the same day; and (c) removed and damaged the victim’s market price, which was installed at a small room window

2. On April 25, 2015, at the same place as paragraph 1, around 22:00, the Defendant injured the victim, such as E, the Defendant’s seat, and paragraph 1, which are the Defendant, misunderstanding the victim that he/she had the right of his/her own future death, and taking the victim’s bath “Crogate” and her bath, he/she inflicted an injury upon the victim, where the victim was unable to know the number of days of treatment, such as the victim’s flabing the breath, leading the victim into the flab, leading the victim to the flab, leading the victim out of the flab, his/her flab, and his/her head was cut.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Investigation report (for damaged articles),

1. 각 관련 사진 [ 피고인과 변호인은, 피고인이 방범 창살을 손괴하지 않았고, 바람을 쐬고 오도록 현관문을 열고 D의 등을 가볍게 밀었을 뿐 양손으로 D을 밀어 넘어지게 하여 상해를 가하지는 않았다고

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., the victim D had been placed in the investigative agency to prevent the Defendant from entering the house, even though the Defendant had been able to do so.