A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. On July 30, 2016, Defendant A appears to have written off the second floor among the third floor of the charges charged by G hospital’s villa C in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon around 06:20, the second floor of the charges seems to have been written off in the third floor.

In female toilets, on the ground that the victim B (66 tax, n, n) told her bad, the victim's neck was boomed, and the victim's body was tightly sealed, and the victim's body was shakend with the victim's head collection from the second floor of the second floor of the same hospital, and the victim's body was divided into the victim's body, and the victim's body was boomed by approximately 28 days under the left-hand section, and the victim's body was flicked by the left-hand flick, the left-hand flick, etc.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, at the same place as above 1’s date and place, in which the dispute with the victim A (44 tax, n, fat) was in place, was sleeped with the victim’s head fat, and the victim’s head fat, was slicked from the stairs of the second floor of the same hospital, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. requiring treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. A medical certificate of injury (two right 15 pages of investigation records);

1. Evidence photograph [Defendant B]

1. Partial statement of the witness A;

1. A medical certificate of injury (two right 52 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (on-site search and witness counterpart investigation) and a report on investigation (investigation into telephone conversations of a blind person);

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B and his defense counsel’s assertion as to the assertion of Defendant B and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted to the effect that Defendant B’s act is legitimate defense. However, according to the evidence above, it is difficult to view Defendant B’s act to be aimed at defending the victim’s wrongful attack. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.