However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

After collecting earth and stones from land C in accordance with the contract, in order to find deposit money from Kim View, the Defendant obtained the consent of completion from the landowner in order to confirm the restoration after completing the collection of earth and rocks. The Defendant forged a document on the ground that C does not interfere with the consent of completion, which is the landowner, and taken the mind to use it for related civil procedure.

1. From December 21, 2009 to August 11, 2011, the Defendant stated in blank pro form “C” as “Written Consent to Completion and Return of Deposits” in the name of “C, after collecting earth and stone from its land, shall not file a civil or criminal complaint, and shall consent to completion.” At the bottom, the Defendant stated “C’s “C” on April 19, 2009,” and affixed C’s seal carrying its name. Accordingly, the Defendant, without authority, forged one “Written Consent to Completion and Return of Deposits” in the name of “C,” which is a private document related to rights and obligations, from August 11, 201 to August 201, 201, the Defendant collected the forged agreement from the Jeonju District Court to the date on which the Defendant filed a motion for completion of the instant case with the court from 201 to 301.21.

The phrase “C” was written at the lower end, stating “C” on April 19, 2009, and affixed C’s seal which was held next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant is given a “written consent for the completion of construction” as a private document.